Showing posts with label Historical Drama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Historical Drama. Show all posts
Monday, 23 May 2011
Good Night, and Good Luck (2005)
The 1950s should have been a time filled with peace and prosperity, a time where humanity would finally realise their inhumanity to each other and live in brotherly harmony together at last after such a destructive and horrific war. Unfortunately, it was an era of paranoia and fear, especially in America, of the newest "evil": Communism. The paranoia was fuelled by four factors; The Soviet Union’s conquest of Eastern Europe; the spread of Communism in Asia; the execution of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, two American Communists who were convicted as committing espionage and giving information on atomic bombs to the Soviet Union; and the most important element in exploiting the fear of Communism and creating a nation of paranoia was Joseph Raymond “Joe” McCarthy, a US Senator who made the claim that Communists were infiltrating the country and were working in the highest levels of government. Many would not dare criticise McCarthy due to fear of being labelled a Communist by McCarthy, however, one man did stand up against the McCarthy witch hunts, a journalist and broadcaster more famous for his wartime broadcasts from London during the Blitz, Edward R. Murrow. Through the Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS), he would criticise and fight against McCarthy’s wild accusations and is believed to be instrumental in both the downfall of McCarthy and the rise of television’s responsibility to inform and illuminate the thoughts and minds of people and not hide the uncomfortable and ugly truths. And so, his struggle to do both is presented in the excellent Good Night, and Good Luck.
Tuesday, 8 February 2011
The King's Speech (2010)
When making a film based on a person in a position of power, like a state head or a leader of a political party, one has to be careful about how they are written or portrayed; if they are seen as flawless or too sympathetic, then you can be accused of idolatry; however, portray them overtly evil or just twisted like a Saturday morning cartoon villain, then you can be accused of bias or just lazy writing. Take, for example Bruno Ganz’s and Robert Carlyle’s portrayal of Hitler in Downfall (Der Untergang) and Hitler: The Rise of Evil respectively; Ganz’s portrayal is of an downtrodden Hitler who has built up a proud nation but due to his arrogance and hatred it is all falling down around him, it’s not a sympathetic performance (which is impossible when the character is Hitler) but it is more realistic, Hitler is a genocidal madman but he is human; however, Carlyle’s portrayal was more cartoonish and was so unsubtle it would be more sublime to have Hitler wearing a top hat and tying Europa to the train tracks of tyranny. Now, I’m not saying you can justify Hitler’s actions, but he wasn’t a demon sent from the very depths of Hell. And now after that long and unrelated diatribe, let’s look at The King’s Speech
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

